top

Search the HRWC web site   

Overall Summary

Chatuge:

 

2003  2004  2005  2006  2007

Nottely:

 

2003  2004  2005  2006  2007

 

2003 NOTTELY RESULTS

 YEAR 1: July 2003 - December 2003

 

Classification Grades Based on Parameters and Ranges (grades defined)

 

Site

Site Name

pH Alk Turb TSS Cond Cu Pb Zn Ortho P NH3 NO3
2 Arkaqua Creek A C A A B A A A B A B
3 Nottely River A C A A B A A A B A A
4 Butternut Creek A B A A C A A A D B B
5 Coosa Creek A D A A A A A A B A A
6 Anderson Creek A C B A B A A A C A B
7 Young Cane Creek A D A A A A A A B A B
8 Ivy Log Creek A D B A A A A A B A A

 

Alk=Alkalinity   Turb=Turbidity   Cu=Copper   Pb=Lead   Zn=Zinc   NH3=Ammonia-N   NO3=Nitrate-N

        

Index Ratings for Nottely Stream Monitoring Sites (ranking defined)

 

Site

Site Name

sediment metals nutrients overall rating
  VWIN - Western NC Regional Average 73 84 76 77  
2 Arkaqua Creek 100 94 83 92 excellent
3 Nottely River 100 94 92 95 excellent
4 Butternut Creek 100 88 58 82 good
5 Coosa Creek 100 100 92 97 excellent
6 Anderson Creek 88 94 75 85 good
7 Young Cane Creek 100 100 83 94 excellent
8 Ivy Log Creek 88 100 92 93 excellent
  average for Nottely stream sites 97 96 82 91  
  percent sites below regional average 0% 0% 25% 0%  

 

Click here to contact the Coalition office if you are interested in water quality monitoring in your area.

Volunteer Monitoring Summary

Top of the Page

 

Need HRWC Web Site Assistance? Email the Web Site Administrator.

Copyright © 2004-2010 HRWC